Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

MAIL MAGAZINE
archives

SDHF Newsletter No. 18: “Dissentient Judgment of Justice Pal”

SDHF Newsletter No. 18: “Dissentient Judgment of Justice Pal”

September 14, 2009

Radhabinod Pal of India was one of the eleven judges at the “Tokyo Trials”.
Of the eleven, he was the only judge who had professional knowledge in
international law. Basing his position strictly on the law and rules of
evidence, he maintained that the Tokyo Trials were in error. He wrote a
dissentient judgment, in which he concluded that “each and everyone of
the accused must be found not guilty of each and every one of the charges
in the indictment and should be acquitted of those charges.”
His judgment is very comprehensive in its historical evidentiary descriptions
and strict application of international law.
This historical document of 700 pages is now available to everyone through
our site, courtesy of Kokusho Kankokai, Inc.

Summary: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/65_S2.pdf
Author profile: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/65_S3.pdf
The whole text: http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/65_S4.pdf

* For an introduction of this book, “The Tokyo Trials and the Truth of ‘Pal’s
Judgment’” (by Prof. Watanabe Shoichi) is available at our site:
http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/63_S4.pdf

Any questions are welcome.

Sincerely,

MOTEKI Hiromichi, Secretary General for KASE Hideaki, Chairman
Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact

BACK TO
PAGE TOP